In recent years, pollution has become a pressing issue that requires immediate attention. Some individuals suggest that the responsibility of mitigating pollution should be placed on companies and private individuals rather than governments. In this essay, I will argue that while individuals and corporations should do their part in reducing pollution, the primary responsibility lies with the government.
On the one hand, it is true that companies and private individuals have a significant impact on pollution levels. Many businesses release harmful pollutants into the environment, and individuals contribute to pollution by driving cars, using plastic products, and engaging in other harmful activities. Therefore, it is crucial that individuals and corporations recognize their role in polluting the environment and take steps to reduce their environmental footprint. For instance, companies can adopt sustainable business practices, and individuals can reduce their carbon emissions by using public transportation or carpooling.
On the other hand, the primary responsibility for reducing pollution must lie with the government. The government has the power to regulate and enforce environmental laws, ensuring that companies and individuals are held accountable for their pollution. Moreover, the government has the resources and infrastructure necessary to undertake large-scale initiatives to reduce pollution, such as investing in renewable energy sources and encouraging the use of eco-friendly technologies. Governments can also incentivize companies to adopt sustainable practices through tax breaks or other financial incentives.
In conclusion, while individuals and companies must do their part in reducing pollution, the primary responsibility for mitigating pollution must lie with the government. By implementing strong environmental regulations and investing in sustainable technologies, the government can ensure that future generations inherit a clean and healthy planet. Therefore, I disagree with the notion that individuals and corporations should bear the entire burden of reducing pollution.
- Pressing: urgent and important.
- Mitigating: making something less severe or intense.
- Harmful: causing or likely to cause harm or damage.
- Environment: the natural world as a whole, including living beings and the physical surroundings.
- Sustainable: able to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources or causing ecological damage.
- Carbon emissions: the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, primarily by burning fossil fuels.
- Renewable energy: energy from a source that is not depleted when used, such as wind, solar, or hydroelectric power.
- Eco-friendly: not harmful to the environment.
- Infrastructure: the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.
- Incentivize: provide someone with an incentive to do something.
- In recent years: refers to a time frame.
- Some individuals suggest that: introducing an argument.
- On the one hand: used to introduce one side of an argument.
- On the other hand: used to introduce the opposing side of an argument.
- Therefore: used to draw a conclusion.
- Moreover: used to introduce an additional point.
- Governments can also: introducing a further point.
- In conclusion: summarizing the main points made in the essay.
- Therefore, I disagree with: expressing the writer’s opinion.